Material topic | Description of the identified impact | Description of the identified risk/ opportunity |
---|---|---|
Climate change adaptation / Portfolio and investments | No identified impact | Climate change adaptation from a portfolio and investment perspective can create downside risks to the loan portfolio, and the impact on financial performance will be seen from the perspective of cash flow, risk (cost and availability of capital), and growth (depending on future business development and portfolio composition). There is also an opportunity related to this sub-topic. The possibility to finance climate change adaptation initiatives may positively impact the bank’s business development (greatest impact on the growth component). |
Climate change mitigation / Portfolio and investments | Emissions arising directly from the bank’s activities
In 2022, the bank’s carbon footprint in Scopes 1 and 2 was 31,613.6 tCO2e (location-based) / 19,499.8 tCO2e (market -based). The carbon footprint in Scope 3, resulting from business travel, was 870.1 tCO2e. The bank is working to reduce its direct carbon footprint, e.g. since 2020 onwards it has been neutral in terms of its own CO2 emissions. The energy purchased directly comes exclusively from renewable sources. In the current calculation methodology for Scope 3, the bank has so far not taken into account the impact of its portfolio with a significant effect on the climate. Santander Bank Polska S.A. is implementing the global Net Zero strategy of the Banco Santander Group. CO2 emissions have a negative impact on the environment, so the impact has been identified as actual and negative. Actual negative impact |
Climate change adaptation from a portfolio and investment perspective can create downside risks to the loan portfolio, and the impact on financial performance will be seen from the perspective of cash flow, risk (cost and availability of capital), and growth (depending on future business development and portfolio composition). There is also an opportunity related to this sub-topic. The possibility to finance climate change adaptation initiatives may positively impact the bank’s business development (greatest impact on the growth component). |
Energy | Energy consumption and efficiency at the bank
In 2022, the bank’s total electricity consumption was 21,670.20 MWh, with 9,551.29 MWh of energy coming from non-renewable resources (the energy purchased by the Bank comes from RES, while the energy for which the Bank is re-invoiced, based on agreements between the bank’s suppliers and energy distributors, comes in part from non-renewable sources). Previous reports do not include data on energy consumption outside the organisation (GRI 302-2). The bank is taking steps to reduce the negative impact by minimising energy consumption and increasing the use of renewable energy sources. Energy consumption negatively impacts the environment, so the impact has been assessed as actual and negative. All measures aimed at increasing the share of renewable energy, among others, have been included in the assessment of the scale of impact. Actual negative impact |
Energy consumption and energy efficiency issues can create short- to medium-term risks of increased office rental costs or energy consumption. We also see the possibility of using cloud solutions and monitoring system to optimise and reduce data storage energy consumption. Risks arise from the current impact of the bank, i.e. the transition to energy-efficient offices and the reduction of emissions from its own operations. |
Selection of material aspects for the bank
- GRI:
-
Process to determine material topics3-1Process to determine material topics
-
List of material topics3-2List of material topics
In 2023, a double materiality analysis was carried out in accordance with ESRS guidelines for the CSRD. The purpose of the analysis was to identify the most relevant ESG topics for Santander Bank Polska S.A.
This analysis comprehensively assesses:
- the bank’s impact on the external environment (impact materiality),
- external risks and opportunities affecting the bank (financial materiality).
The juxtaposition of impact materiality and financial materiality allows the identification of material topics, which the bank then takes into account in its strategy and non-financial reporting.
The double materiality analysis process involved the bank’s internal and external stakeholders; employees, suppliers, business partners, representatives of NGOs, financial institutions and regulators.
The survey included, among other things a dialogue session with selected external stakeholders and an anonymous survey addressed to employees.
The employee survey was conducted online in July 2023.
The dialogue session took place on 27 July 2023 on the MS Teams online platform. This was the bank’s 11th session on sustainability and responsible business conduct. In line with market best practice, the session was conducted based on the AA1000SES international dialogue standard, with the participation of independent facilitators from a consultancy firm.
The dialogue session included discussions in three thematic groups:
-
Responsible business relationships and their impact on the environment and society,
-
Responsibility for the bank's employees and social activities,
-
Sustainable finance and customer relations.
The summary materials of the survey and dialogue session were presented to the bank’s Management Board. Their conclusions have been incorporated into the double materiality analysis and into the new strategy ”We help you achieve more”.
The process of double materiality assessment consisted of four stages.
- In the first stage, the assumptions of the ESRS double materiality analysis were defined and the bank’s value chain was identified taking into account the three levels of its stakeholders: upstream, own operations and downstream according to the ESRS guidelines.
- In the second stage, the bank’s potentially significant impacts, risks and opportunities were identified across ten ESRS-compliant topics: climate change, pollution, water and marine resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, resource use and the circular economy, own workforce, workers in the value chain, affected communities, consumers and end-users and business conduct. The double materiality analysis process included stakeholder dialogue, external analysis (analysis of the sector and the socio-economic situation in the year covered by the report) and internal analysis (analysis of themes identified in the strategy or due diligence processes).
- In the third stage, the previously identified impacts, risks and opportunities were subjected to a materiality assessment based on the four categories identified in the ESRS: scale, scope, reversibility and likelihood of impact of the risk or opportunity. These assessments were confirmed with the bank’s key executives during a workshop.
- In the final fourth stage, the topics assessment was prioritised, a materiality threshold was established and adopted, and a final materiality matrix was developed.
Conclusions from the double materiality analysis:
- Five sustainability themes were selected for inclusion in the ESG Report.
- Three topics – Climate change, Consumers and end-users, and Business conduct – were rated as material (’significant’, 'critical’, 'important’).
- Two topics – Own workforce and Affected communities – were rated as additionally material (’informative’) – for inclusion in the report.
In 2023 we made changes to our methodology for the survey of relevant topics. One of the main reasons was to conduct the analysis based on ESRS. This makes the bank’s previous survey incomparable to the one carried out in 2023. Nevertheless, we have mapped and assessed the consistency of the current materiality matrix with the previous list of material topics.
The final results of the analysis include a breakdown of impacts, risks and opportunities into ESRS thematic standards.