• GRI:
  • Activities, value chain and other business relationships2-6
    Activities, value chain and other business relationships
  • Management of material topics (identified as material in the materiality matrix3-3
    Management of material topics (identified as material in the materiality matrix
  • Processes to remediate negative impacts2-25
    Processes to remediate negative impacts
  • PRB:
  • Impact and Target Setting2
    Impact and Target Setting
  • Clients and Customers3
    Clients and Customers
  • Governance & Culture5
    Governance & Culture
  • GPW:
  • Integration of sustainability topicsI-P2
    Integration of sustainability topics
  • Management of sustainability mattersI-P3
    Management of sustainability matters
  • Significant impact, risks and opportunitiesI-P4
    Significant impact, risks and opportunities
  • Managing climate change issues E-P1
    Managing climate change issues
  • GRI:
  • Description of the bank's approach to implementing ESG regulatory requirements into its business strategyCustom indicator
    Description of the bank's approach to implementing ESG regulatory requirements into its business strategy
  • Description of policies, procedures and results of climate risk exposure testingCustom indicator
    Description of policies, procedures and results of climate risk exposure testing

When making decisions, we take into account various ESG risks. The management of these risks is part of a broader, comprehensive risk management process at Santander Bank Polska Group. This system is based on three independent and complementary levels, the so-called lines of defence.

All implemented solutions:

  • take into account the bank’s exposure to risks,
  • cover all relevant risks, including environmental, social and governance risks,
  • cover the adequacy and effectiveness of the risks and the interdependencies of the different risk types,
  • enable the bank to make effective decisions on the implementation of its management strategy.

In 2023, significant changes took place in the area of ESG risk management at Santander Bank Polska S.A.. Responsibility for these risks has been assigned to the Risk Management Division, and the person responsible at the Management Board level is the Vice President in charge of this division. ESG risks have been included in the division’s strategy (by defining channels for their transmission to traditional banking risks) and in the division’s regulations in terms of tasks and responsibilities.

To ensure that the ESG risk management area is properly organised within the division, an ESG Risk Management Office has also been established. Among other things, the office is responsible for integrating the ESG risk management approach into the bank’s existing internal risk management framework. This includes the integration of ESG issues into the credit risk assessment process, the valuation of collateral and subsequent monitoring. The Office is also tasked with supporting the implementation of the bank’s strategy in respect of ESG aspects, particularly with regard to the emissivity analysis of the loan portfolio, as well as through the development of policies and analytical tools to support clients in their transformation towards a low-carbon economy. The office’s activities are also aimed at mitigating greenwashing risks through oversight of internal processes, certification of sustainable finance and ongoing collaboration with the reputational risk function.

Proper definition of the risks associated with climate change is necessary to take action to increase resilience to these risks. It also provides a way to better exploit the opportunities associated with the challenges posed by climate change in order to improve the growth dynamics, financial performance and image of the Group. In line with TCFD recommendations, climate change risks are identified and analysed under two categories: physical and transition risks.

Physical risks arise from the increasing severity and frequency of extreme weather events, such as violent storms or floods (acute physical risks). In many sectors, these can cause direct damage to assets and disruption to infrastructure. Such risks can also affect companies indirectly, by necessitating a change in their business profile, increasing costs (e.g. insurance) or even preventing them from operating.

The second group of physical risks are those associated with gradual and prolonged changes in climate patterns over the medium to long term, particularly as a result of increases in average temperatures (chronic physical risks). In this category, the agricultural sector has an inherent exposure, due to an increase in the risk of land erosion, which has an impact on the quality and quantity of the yields achieved. In the medium to long term, the deteriorating hydrological situation of Poland and the threat of drought is also a risk factor. Lack of adequate water retention systems and water shortages can have a number of negative effects. They may affect various sectors of the economy, including, inter alia, the energy sector (e.g. thermal power plants using river water in cooling systems may have to reduce energy production during periods of drought). Deterioration of hydrological conditions may also mean an increase in fire risk and potential losses in timber production, among other negative impacts.

Transition risks relate to the transition towards a low-carbon economy, in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement and the strategic direction set by the European Green Deal. Such a transition implies major structural changes in the global economy, entailing many risks, including rapidly emerging losses from so-called stranded assets. The consequences of these processes are complex and multidimensional, making the assessment of transition risks difficult but extremely important. From the Group’s perspective, these risks can affect the Group both directly and indirectly through their impact on the Group’s customers.

Regulatory risks are one category of transition risks. They relate to the revision of regulations aimed at preventing climate change and promoting adaptation to climate change. New, stricter regulations that will force climate-friendly solutions may lead to higher operating costs for some companies. Sectors dependent on coal and other fossil fuels, on which the Polish energy mix is predominantly based, are particularly vulnerable to these risks. Regulatory risks arise from the rising cost of CO2 emissions, stricter reporting and data collection requirements and even regulatory changes imposing restrictions on the operation of some particularly carbon-intensive businesses. A risk not yet so widespread in Poland, but already noticeable in Western European countries, are lawsuits brought, for example, by NGOs. These are aimed at holding companies legally responsible for contributing to climate change or combating so-called greenwashing. The risk of litigation applies largely to companies operating in the most harmful and carbon-intensive sectors.

Technological risks are another group, as decarbonisation and the transformation of the economy will require support in the form of technological innovation. For many companies and industries, profound technological change may mean the loss of asset and infrastructure value and the need to invest in R&D and the implementation of new technologies.

The economic transformation and structural changes also involve market risks. Changes in the demand and supply of raw materials and commodities will affect their prices and, as a result, the production costs of companies. Consumer choices and the wider macroeconomic environment, including the competitiveness of the economy or the level of interest rates, will also be subject to change.

The final group of transition risks are reputational risks. These relate to increased consumer awareness and unethical or unconscious greenwashing actions on the part of businesses.

Analysis and assessment of the transmission of climate risks to banking risks

Climate risks and ESG risks in general have not been set aside as a separate category of risks relevant to Santander Bank Polska Group. The approach used is to analyse and assess the transmission of climate risks to banking risks, in line with TCFD recommendations. The results of the analysis are presented in the table below.

Wyniki analiz ryzyk klimatycznych
Impact of physical risks Impact of transition risks Approach to risk management
Credit risk
Climate risk can negatively affect borrowers and reduce their ability to service their debt.

More frequent and intense weather emergencies and natural disasters may furthermore reduce the value of the loan collateral.

EU or national regulation may reduce the debt-servicing capacity of business borrowers operating in certain sectors, primarily in high-carbon industries such as:

  • energy,
  • oil & gas,
  • transport.
We integrate ESG risks into the credit risk assessment and monitoring process, both at the customer level and at the loan portfolio level. In the following sections of this report, changes are described that are gradually being introduced into the credit process. ESG considerations are becoming increasingly important in sectoral analyses and strategies.
Market risk
Risk of losses arising from changes in the value of the bank’s assets and liabilities caused by natural disasters and sudden weather events. An increase in the cost of CO2 emissions may drive up costs for some companies (particularly in carbon-intensive sectors such as energy and oil & gas). This may lead to a reduction in revenue for these companies and, consequently, a decline in investment capacity which in turn, may result in fewer loan applications.

Regulatory pressures may indirectly affect the financial market by reducing investment in selected customer groups.

Due to the current structure of  its trading book, the bank does not identify a quantifiable impact of ESG factors on market risk. This means that there is no significant impact of supply, demand or instrument prices, on the bank’s performance results or on the level of risk incurred.

At the same time, the bank has an ongoing agenda to analyse whether the impact of ESG factors on market risk is becoming material, in particular with regard to potential changes in the structure of the trading book.

Liquidity risk
Climate change, including natural disasters and sudden weather events, can cause a surge in demand for cash. No significant impact of transition risk was identified. Appropriate procedures have been defined so that ESG risks are included in the annual liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP), in which we estimate net outflows.
Operational risk
Sudden weather events may affect the conduct of business at bank branches (e.g. flooding, power outages). Higher energy costs may increase the burden on the bank (e.g. increase in the cost of space rental). ESG risks are identified, valued and monitored as part of the risk self-assessment process. They are mandatory risks in this process.

As part of the scenario analyses, a scenario is examined that assumes the materialisation of events caused by ESG factors.

Under current regulations, the bank’s units are required to report ESG events to the operational event database.

In November 2023, operational risk indicators monitoring ESG risks were included in the reporting.

Business risk
No significant impact of physical risk was identified. In the short term, there is an increase in costs associated with the transition to a low-carbon economy. Some of these costs are passed on to consumers, which may reduce their willingness and/or ability to take out consumer loans (e.g. to buy new cars).

Regulation and changes in customer decisions can create new opportunities to offer products or services. Failure to take appropriate action may lead to an exodus of customers to competitors.

The impact of transition risks on the bank’s business operations is analysed on an ongoing basis, which is reflected in the bank’s strategic actions and product offering.
Reputational risk
No significant impact of physical risk was identified. Continued financing of sectors negatively perceived by regulators, the market and rating agencies (mainly carbon-intensive industries) may negatively affect the bank’s rating. We pay particular attention to the transparent communication of sector policies.

We apply reputational risk management policies.

We seek to engage clients in addressing climate change and environmental conditions.

We conduct appropriate analysis in terms of reputational risk and analyse clients’ climate strategies.

Compliance risk
No significant impact of physical risk was identified. Regulatory pressures are likely to intensify, which may increase in-house and/or consultancy costs as a result of meeting the obligation to comply with new regulations.

In the event of non-compliance with the new regulations, there may be a risk of fines imposed by market regulators.

We are constantly reviewing the regulations affecting our bank and are fully compliant with the requirements set by EU and national regulators.

As part of the global Santander Group, we are part of the Net Zero Banking Alliance.

Risk materiality analysis – materiality matrix

A new methodology for identifying sectors vulnerable to climate risks and assessing the materiality of climate risks for these sectors was adopted in 2023. Sectors with the highest exposure to climate risks were identified based on TCFD and UNEP FI guidelines. The table below shows the list of identified sectors (excluding those with negligible contribution to the bank’s portfolio)1:

Analiza istotności ryzyk – macierz istotności
Sector Examples of sub-sectors
Agriculture Crop growing, animal farming, horticulture, forestry
Industrial processing Food, beverages, tobacco, wood products, chemicals, plastics, building materials, machinery
Mining and metallurgy Mining of coal and metal ores, coke production, metal and steel production
Fuel sector (oil and gas) Mining, processing, distribution, integrated companies
Electricity generation and supply, with a distinction between conventional and renewable sources All energy sources: coal, gas, oil, nuclear, solar, wind, biomass, energy distribution
Real estate, construction, mortgages Mortgage lending to individuals, commercial property financing, construction
Transport Production of cars and trucks and other means of transport, shipping, air transport, rail transport, road transport
1 Such as car loans and leases for private customers and water supply.

Similarly to the previous year, we have treated renewable energy generation as a separate sector. In 2023, we further identified mortgage lending as a separate category. The sectors identified in the above process and the mortgage portfolio were assessed as relatively sensitive to climate risks. The remaining sectors and the portfolio of retail loans other than mortgages were assessed as relatively insensitive to climate risk.

A materiality matrix of climate risks was developed for the identified sectors, which became the basis for reporting for the Business and Corporate Banking (BCB), Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) portfolios and for the mortgage portfolio (other portfolios will be included in the assessment as the methodology evolves).

The resulting materiality matrix is currently used in the process of reporting the materiality of climate risks in the portfolio. In the next stages, we envisage applying it to other processes (including as part of the environmental and social risk assessment at the individual client level). Further work on refining the analysis of climate risks aims to include quantitative assessments and incorporate them into the Risk Dashboard – aggregated risk information presented at the level of the bank’s Management Board and Supervisory Board. Ultimately, the results of the materiality analysis will be used to define risk appetite.

Strategy resilience – Sensitivity of sectors to climate risks

In 2023, the bank carried out an analysis of the portfolio sensitivity to climate risks, taking into account an assessment of the sensitivity of the most exposed sectors included in the portfolio. The analysis was carried out over three time horizons – short (2030), medium (2040) and long (2050). In contrast to the analysis carried out in previous years, it was decided to use the climate scenarios defined by the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). This group of central banks and supervisors determined to work towards a better understanding and management of climate risks already brings together more than 130 institutions (including the largest ones such as the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve System).

The following three scenarios<sup>2</sup> were considered:

assumes that a gradual tightening of climate policy (with 67% probability) will succeed in limiting the average temperature increase to this level. This scenario belong to the category of Orderly Transition scenarios;

and a limited range of negative emissions. Limiting the temperature increase to below 2°C will require very strong climate policy action in this scenario. This scenario belongs to the category of Disorderly Transition scenarios,

assumes that the measures implemented to date will be continued, but that the targets remaining at the declaration level will not be met. The materialisation of this scenario will be associated with a high level of physical risks. This scenario belongs to the category of Hot House World scenarios.

2 Defined by NGFS in Phase III in September 2022.

Following the approach recommended by the TCFD, the analysis considered the main risks from both categories: physical risks (PR) and transition risks (TR). In 2023, the methodology for assessing climate risks was refined (for a description of the risk materiality analysis methodology by sector, see Risk management, Risk materiality analysis). Risks were assessed on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 means very low risk and 5 means very high risk). The analysis was qualitative, but carried out from a double materiality perspective, i.e. considering the channels of the bank’s impact on climate change and the impact of climate change on the bank’s performance. The methodology and scope of this analysis is being continuously enhanced to reflect more and more accurately the impact of climate risks on the bank’s portfolio.

The evolution of physical and transition risks in the 11 sectors most sensitive to climate risks in which Banco Santander clients are active was analysed. Nine of these 11 sectors are materially represented in Santander Bank Polska S.A. The table below shows the results of this analysis, together with a presentation of the materiality of each sector in the bank’s portfolio. The results of the analysis carried out due to the change in methodology are not directly comparable to those presented in the ESG 2022 Report, partly because the taxonomy of sectors sensitive to climate risks has been changed. The process of integrating the results of the analysis carried out into the risk management system is underway, in particular taking into account their integration into risk tolerance and application to the credit process.

Legenda ryzyka

Ryzyko na poziomie 1

Ryzyko na poziomie 2

Ryzyko na poziomie 3

Ryzyko na poziomie 4

Ryzyko na poziomie 5

Transition risks – (RT)

Physical risks – (RF)

Analiza ryzyk
Sectors sensitive
to climate risks
Quality assessment* Transition risks (RT) Physical risks (RF) Current sector share
in the segment
**
TR FR Orderly Disorderly Hot House World Orderly Disorderly Hot House World BCB CIB SME Retail customers
2030 2040 2050 2030 2040 2050 2030 2040 2050 2030 2040 2050 2030 2040 2050 2030 2040 2050
Oil and gas 0.5% 10.8% 0.0%
Mining and metallurgy 12.6% 12.4% 7.4%
Energy – power generation from conventional sources 0.8% 25.9% 1.1%
Renewable energy generation (RES) 0.0% 8.6% 0.0%
Transport 13.1% 4.9% 20.0%
Consumer car loans and leasing***
Agriculture 1.9% 0.5% 32.6%
Industrial processing 35.6% 21.6% 16.8%
Water supply*** 1.6% 0.0% 1.1%
Construction 14.7% 8.6% 17.9%
Real estate and mortgages 19.0% 5.4% 3.2% 100%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100%
* For the purpose of a rapid assessment of the portfolio structure, a simplified materiality matrix at the aggregate macro-sector level may also be used.
** Portfolio structure at the end of 2023.
*** The Consumer Car Loans and Leasing and Water Supply sectors are locally immaterial to the bank's portfolio.
BCB – Business & Corporate Banking
CIB – Corporate & Investment Banking
SME – Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

The share of each sector in the total climate-sensitive portfolio at the end of 2023 is shown in the chart below. Mortgages account for the largest share (46%), followed by the industrial processing sector (16%).

Projects are still underway to assess transition and physical risks in a systemic and quantitative way at client level. We are estimating the emissivity of all the bank’s business customers and retail mortgage products. With this, we have started a detailed estimation of transition risks and are defining actions dedicated to key parts of the portfolio. This also allows us to integrate environmental aspects into standard portfolio analysis processes, and to set targets and funding limits at appropriate levels.

The Santander Bank Polska  Group has identified climate-related risks and opportunities as having an impact on financial instruments and has incorporated them into its main risk management processes. The impact of climate change on the Group’s operations has been defined at a high level, but as part of the refinement process, further elaboration of this analysis is planned to include more in-depth quantification of the impact of the aforementioned risks.

Portfolio exposure to climate risks

Our calculation of climate risk exposure answers the question about the proportion of sectors from different risk categories in our portfolio of each segment (Business and Corporate Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking  and Small and Medium-sized Enterprises). In doing so, we assume that the portfolio structure will be the same as at the end of 2023.

Physical risks

The charts below show the exposure of each segment to physical risks, as shown in the legend below.

2030 rok – Poniżej 2°C (Below 2°C)
2030  – (Below 2°C)
Low Average
BCB 95% 4%
CIB 64% 35%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2030 rok – Opóźniona transformacja (Delayed Transition)
2030 (Delayed Transition)
Low Average
BCB 95% 4%
CIB 64% 35%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2030 rok – Obecne polityki (Current policies)
2030 (Current policies)
Low Average
BCB 95% 5%
CIB 53% 46%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2040 rok – Poniżej 2°C (Below 2°C)
2040 (Below 2°C)
Low Average
BCB 95% 4%
CIB 64% 35%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2040 rok – Opóźniona transformacja (Delayed Transition)
2040 (Delayed Transition)
Low Average
BCB 95% 4%
CIB 64% 35%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2040 rok – Obecne polityki (Current policies)
2040 (Current policies)
Low Average
BCB 95% 5%
CIB 53% 46%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2050 rok – Poniżej 2°C (Below 2°C)
2050  (Below 2°C)
Low Average
BCB 95% 4%
CIB 64% 35%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2050 rok – Opóźniona transformacja (Delayed Transition)
2050 (Delayed Transition)
Low Average
BCB 95% 4%
CIB 64% 35%
SME 65% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

2050 rok – Obecne polityki (Current policies)
2050 (Current policies)
Low Average High
BCB 40% 55% 4%
CIB 26% 38% 35%
SME 45% 20% 35%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy

In most scenarios, the portfolio will be predominantly made up of sectors rated as 'low risk’. A slightly higher risk rating (’medium risk’) applies to the energy and RES, as well as agriculture and water supply sectors, hence the higher share of this category and exposure in the corporate and investment banking (CIB) and SME segments. This applies to the entire period of analysis, as significant materialisation of physical risks according to the assumed NGFS scenarios will only occur after 2050. The exposure would be somewhat different in the Hot House World scenario, in which higher risk ratings also apply to the oil & gas sector and several other sectors in 2050, as physical risks may materialise a little faster in this scenario.

Transition risks

We then carried out a similar analysis for transformational risks. The charts below show the exposure to transformation risks assuming the same portfolio structure (at the end of 2023).

2030 rok – Poniżej 2°C (Below 2°C)
2030  (Below2°C)
Very low Low Average High Very high
BCB nie dotyczy 50% 22% 14% 13%
CIB 9% 30% 6% 31% 23%
SME nie dotyczy 35% 37% 21% 7%
Mortgages nie dotyczy nie dotyczy 100% nie dotyczy nie dotyczy

Delayed Transition –  The scenario has not been defined for 2030.

2030 rok – Obecne polityki (Current policies)
2030  (Current policies)
Low Average High
BCB 40% 55% 4%
CIB 26% 38% 35%
SME 45% 20% 35%
Mortgages nie dotyczy 100% nie dotyczy

2040 rok – Poniżej 2°C (Below 2°C)
2040 (Below 2°C)
Very low Low Average High
BCB nie dotyczy 50% 22% 27%
CIB 9% 30% 6% 54%
SME nie dotyczy 35% 37% 28%
Mortgages nie dotyczy nie dotyczy 100% nie dotyczy

2040 rok – Opóźniona transformacja (Delayed Transition)
2040 (Delayed Transition)
Very low Low Average High Very high
BCB 34% 36% 3% 14% 13%
CIB 23% 22% 1% 31% 23%
SME 21% 17% 34% 21% 7%
Mortgages 100% nie dotyczy nie dotyczy nie dotyczy nie dotyczy

2050 rok – Poniżej 2°C (Below 2°C)
2050 (Below 2°C)
Very low Low High Very high
BCB nie dotyczy 50% 22% 27%
CIB 9% 30% 6% 54%
SME nie dotyczy 35% 37% 28%
Mortgages nie dotyczy nie dotyczy 100% nie dotyczy

2050 rok – Opóźniona transformacja (Delayed Transition)
2050 (Delayed Transition)
Very low Low Average High Very high
BCB nie dotyczy 69% 3% 26% 1%
CIB 9% 36% 1% 43% 11%
SME nie dotyczy 38% 34% 28% nie dotyczy
Mortgages nie dotyczy 100% nie dotyczy nie dotyczy nie dotyczy

2050 rok – Obecne polityki (Current policies)
2050  (Current policies)
Very low Low Average High
BCB nie dotyczy 86% 13% 1%
CIB 9% 59% 5% 26%
SME nie dotyczy 79% 20% 1%
Mortgages nie dotyczy 100% nie dotyczy nie dotyczy

In the Orderly Transition scenario, the portfolio’s exposure to transition risks is slightly higher in the short term, due to the very high risk rating for the oil and gas sector and the metals and mining sector. In the medium and long term, the risk assessments for these two sectors are slightly lower, hence the lower portfolio exposure across all segments. Exposure is highest for the Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) segment (due to the relatively high share of the energy and metals and mining sectors in the portfolio). In the other segments, the exposure stems from the share of the transport sector and, in the case of Business and Corporate Banking (BCB), additionally from the significant share of the metals sector.

In the Disorderly Transition scenario, exposure to climate risks is highest in the medium term – over 20% of the Corporate and Investment Banking portfolio will be categorised as very high risk (13% for the Business and Corporate Banking segment). To compare, this category is not present in this time horizon when the transition takes place in an orderly manner. In the long term (2050), the share of the very high-risk category will be much smaller (entirely absent in the BCB and SME portfolio).

The last scenario under consideration (Hot House World) does not assume rapid and ambitious climate policy action, which results in significantly lower ratings of transition risks compared to the other scenarios. The exposure of the portfolios in this scenario will decrease somewhat further in the medium term. Only for the portfolio of the Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) will the exposure increase in the 2050 horizon, driven by the contribution of the energy sector.

The bank and Group entities considered the risks associated with climate change when preparing their financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and other necessary disclosures. Based on the analysis performed, there was no material impact of environmental issues on the financial statements as a whole.

The opportunities ahead of the Group are particularly related to the development of the RES market and the possibility to invest in projects and businesses in this sector, as well as the possibility to be involved in the financing of transport electrification projects, including the uptake of electric and low-emission cars and low-emission public transport. The opportunity to engage in financing decarbonisation projects for the bank’s clients is also an important prospect. New business opportunities identified in the longer term will be related to cooperation with companies taking part in the transformation of the Polish energy sector and the development of advisory services for the selection of low-carbon solutions for the agribusiness sector and the development of financial services in this area.

Climate risk management is part of a wider, comprehensive risk management process at Santander Bank Polska Group. In line with the results of the material risks identification and update process completed in the first quarter of 2023, climate risks have not been set aside as a separate category of these risks. Channels of transmission of climate risks to banking risks were identified, including credit, compliance, reputational, business and operational risks. The analysis of risk transmission channels is being enhanced all the time and the perspective of the impact analysed is now being extended to include market risk for the trading book and liquidity risk. The application of this approach has an impact on the process of estimating and quantifying material risks.

ESG risks are also taken into account in the bank’s annual Risk Profile Assessment process.

The process of reporting the materiality of climate risks for the portfolio, based on the materiality matrix described above, will continue to be refined and deepened. The first quantitative report on the materiality of climate risks based on the new methodology was presented to the Credit Risk Committee in the fourth quarter of 2023. Following modifications planned for the first half of 2024, a summary of materiality assessment results by physical and transformational risks will also be included in the main risk report, which currently contains qualitative information on climate risks and ESG risks in general.

Preparations are also underway for a climate stress test in 2024, which will take into account both the transition risks materialisation scenario and additional factors associated with the materialisation of physical risks.

Santander Bank Polska is implementing a project for the systemic collection of data on climate risks and ESG data in a wider sense, in support of its risk management processes. We use external databases for this purpose, including the Central Register of Energy Performance of Buildings and databases maintained by the Credit Information Bureau. We also work with external data providers. The process of acquiring the first iteration of the data should be completed in the first half of 2024. Information on the quantitative assessment of climate risks (and ESG risks more broadly) is gradually being integrated into the processes of identification, valuation and monitoring of banking risks. ESG risk indicators are already included in analyses of operational, market and liquidity risks.

Climate risk issues are increasingly being integrated into risk assessment at the stage of credit processes.

As part of the Policy for the management of social, environmental and climate change risks, the following procedures have been defined for the analysis of ESG risks:

  • the Environmental, Social and Climate Change Risk Analysis applicable to customers of the Corporate and Investment Banking (CIB) segment,
  • the Environmental and Social Risk Analysis procedure for BCB Customers, applicable to customers of the Business and Corporate Banking segment.

The ESG risk assessment aims to assess the customer’s ability to manage all ESG risks allowing for an analysis of the impact of the customer’s actions on their mitigation.

The risk analysis for the global client segment is carried out locally, in line with the solutions used in the Banco Santander Group. An individual ESCC (Environmental Social & Climate Change) risk analysis is performed. It applies to transactions or clients operating in the sectors defined in the Social, Environmental and Climate Change Risk Management Policy, in particular including the oil and gas, energy, mining and metals and soft commodities sectors. The ESCC risk analysis and the resulting recommendation is taken into account in the client’s credit application and is a component of periodic reviews. New sensitive sub-sectors are integrated into this process, such as automotive and food and chemical sectors (in particular plastic production and agrochemicals).

In addition, for customers from sectors with high CO2 emissions, a structured analysis of plans to transform operations towards lower carbon emissions is carried out. The analysis includes customers from such industries as energy, coal mining, airlines and steel production. Moreover, for international corporate clients, the analysis of physical and transition risks is taken into account in a qualitative part of the client rating process. If these factors have a significant impact on the credit risk assessment, an appropriate description is added to the rating.

For project finance, an analysis in line with the Equator Principles, a market standard and common language for assessing environmental and social risks in projects among large financial institutions worldwide, is applied. This assessment is carried out as part of the ESCC Risk Analysis for Financed Projects, a procedure implemented in 2023, in cooperation with the business line and ESCC analysts. As a first step, it identifies a project category, which depends on the potential impact on environmental and social issues. This is followed by an environmental and social impact analysis, the granularity of which depends on the category assigned. The recommendation resulting from the analysis becomes part of the credit application.

For other corporate customers, a largely automated algorithm is now used. It enables the preselection of climate risks, based on which customers receive statuses within specific areas, so-called environmental flags. These are assigned to all customers as part of a portfolio analysis conducted on the basis of the characteristics of individual companies (including the section of the Polish Classification of Activities in which they operate). In addition, if a potentially elevated ESG risk is identified by any participant in the credit process (banker, credit analyst or Credit Committee), a request for additional individual analysis is made to the ESG Risk Management Office (this process has not yet been formalised).

Further work is planned for 2024 to comprehensively integrate ESG factors into the structured risk assessment process for Business and Corporate Banking customers. The implementation of the relevant solutions should take place in the third and fourth quarters of 2024. As a next step, an appropriate translation of this process to the SME segment will be developed in line with the principle of proportionality.

With regard to retail customers, the bank is primarily working on expanding the data held and analysed on transition risk and the risk of changing consumer preferences with regard to the mortgage portfolio. This data will also be key to developing the assessment of ESG risks (including climate risks) in the business property segment.

Work is also currently underway to collect data to properly reflect climate risks in collateral valuation, in line with the letter received from the PFSA in March 2023 communicating supervisory expectations in the ESG area. Market solutions and guidelines for property valuations are monitored on an ongoing basis, but at the moment there are no uniform standards. Work on defining an internal methodology for the impact of climate risks on collateral valuation is scheduled for the second half of 2024. This will ultimately allow the definition of procedures resulting in a requirement for external appraisers to provide certain data and reflect the  identified risks in property valuations.

As of January 2024, the bank has a standardised and streamlined process for obtaining building energy performance certificates for properties securing the repayment of a loan, if the purpose of the loan is the same as the collateral property. This process will allow for the massive acquisition of energy efficiency and CO2 emissions data at property level.

Projects are also underway to obtain data from external sources,  regarding, for instance, physical risks at the municipality level, including chronic and acute risks, relevant climate scenarios and time horizons, and data from a central register of building energy performance.